Please reach us at info@thehygenesis.com if you have any other questions.
Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl) is a remarkably powerful and non-toxic disinfectant that plays a central role in the human immune system. It is naturally produced by white blood cells as part of the body’s first line of defense against invading pathogens. When your immune system detects harmful bacteria, viruses, or fungi, it generates HOCl to neutralize these threats quickly and effectively—on contact.
In its pure, stabilized form, HOCl has been proven to kill a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, spores, molds, and even biofilms, which are notoriously resistant to conventional disinfectants. Unlike traditional chemical sanitizers—many of which are toxic, corrosive, or environmentally harmful—HOCl is completely safe for humans, animals, plants, and food-contact surfaces. It is non-irritating to skin and mucous membranes, requires no rinsing, and breaks down harmlessly into saline after use.
Modern electrochemical technology, such as that developed by HYGENESIS, makes it possible to generate HOCl using only salt, water, and electricity. This enables scalable, on-demand disinfection without the hazards of bleach, alcohol, formaldehyde, or quaternary ammonium compounds.
HOCl vs. Virkon
Virkon, a monopersulfate-based oxidizer combined with detergent-like surfactants, is widely used in agriculture for equipment and facility sanitation. While it is broad-spectrum and effective against many pathogens, it is also corrosive and toxic—harmful to skin, eyes, lungs, and unsafe for use around animals or in occupied spaces. Importantly, Virkon is ineffective against resistant infectious agents like prions (e.g., Mad Cow, CWD), which HOCl neutralizes within minutes. HOCl, by contrast, is non-toxic, safe enough for human and food contact, and effective against a broader spectrum of pathogens—including prions—without harming people or equipment.
HOCl vs. Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde is a potent biocide that has largely fallen out of use due to its well-established carcinogenicity. While once common in fogging applications, formaldehyde’s toxic profile and regulatory restrictions have made it increasingly obsolete. HOCl achieves powerful disinfection without any carcinogenic risks, enabling widespread use in air, on surfaces, and even on skin.
HOCl vs. Chlorine Bleach (Sodium Hypochlorite)
Bleach gained attention during the COVID-19 pandemic but soon proved to be a double-edged sword. Long-term exposure caused irreversible lung damage among healthcare workers and corrosion of sensitive equipment. While bleach can inactivate prions, it requires prolonged soaking in highly concentrated (≥10%) hot solutions. In contrast, a chlorine atom in HOCl is up to 100 times more potent than in bleach, acting faster, more effectively, and with far less risk to people or materials. HOCl is also pH-neutral, non-corrosive, and leaves no hazardous residues.
HOCl vs. Iodine Solutions
Iodine-based disinfectants suffer from several drawbacks: limited potency compared to chlorine, strong staining properties, tissue irritation, and a high incidence of allergic reactions—especially with repeated use. They have also been shown to impair wound healing. HOCl is non-staining, non-allergenic, and supports wound recovery, making it vastly superior for both antiseptic and environmental use.
HOCl vs. Phenols
Phenol and its derivatives have been used for over a century based on their strong odor and biocidal action. However, phenols are also carcinogenic, irritating to skin and eyes, and can damage lung tissue with repeated exposure. Their use persists in lower-regulation markets but has become increasingly inappropriate elsewhere. HOCl provides a safer, more effective alternative with no carcinogenic concerns.
HOCl vs. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (Quats)
Quats are among the most commonly used disinfectants due to their low cost and detergent action. However, their widespread aerosolization during the pandemic revealed significant health risks, including permanent lung damage. They are only moderately effective against viruses, and bacterial resistance is growing. Regulatory scrutiny is increasing. HOCl, with its broad-spectrum efficacy, rapid action, and safety for inhalation and human contact, is quickly becoming the preferred replacement.
HOCl vs. Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂)
Hydrogen peroxide is a powerful oxidant increasingly used in greenhouse operations. While effective on molds and available for on-site generation, it poses significant dangers: inhalation at 1–2 ppm can cause irreversible lung damage, and concentrated forms are explosive and require special handling. HOCl offers comparable disinfection power without the toxicity, instability, or safety hazards—making it ideal for large-scale fogging in occupied or sensitive environments..
Yes. HYGENESIS HOCl is food-contact safe, non-toxic, non-corrosive, and leaves no harmful residues. It’s ideal for kitchens, hospitals, and public spaces.
We provide HOCl solutions for agriculture, food processing, healthcare, hospitality, industrial sanitation, and environmental disinfection.
We own the underlying technology and have solved the challenges of stability and scale. Our dual-stream systems also produce NaOH for powerful cleaning applications.
Yes. Unlike conventional systems, our HOCl remains stable over time thanks to precision-controlled electrolysis and proprietary manufacturing methods.
Absolutely. HYGENESIS HOCl is safe and effective for airborne pathogen control through fogging or misting in indoor environments.
Yes. Our modular systems and containerized production units are designed for scalable deployment worldwide, with support for both local use and bottled distribution.
We use advanced electrolysis systems to convert salt and water into pure HOCl with precise pH and potency—made fresh on-site or in high-capacity production units.